<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cinemaddicts.org Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemaddicts.org/blog</link>
	<description>We Suffer Through Bad Movies So You Don't Have To. . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on In The Name of The King:  Another Uwe Boll Fiasco by FlamingDP</title>
		<link>http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2008/01/24/in-the-name-of-the-king-another-uwe-boll-fiasco/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>FlamingDP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2008/01/24/in-the-name-of-the-king-another-uwe-boll-fiasco/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>My question about this is:  How does this guy keep getting financing for this crap?  I mean is there really that much money to be tossed around?  If so, tell me where it is.  Someone could pay me the same amount of money to film myself taking a deuce and I bet it draws a bigger audience.  Or at least better reviews.  

AK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question about this is:  How does this guy keep getting financing for this crap?  I mean is there really that much money to be tossed around?  If so, tell me where it is.  Someone could pay me the same amount of money to film myself taking a deuce and I bet it draws a bigger audience.  Or at least better reviews.  </p>
<p>AK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In The Name of The King:  Another Uwe Boll Fiasco by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2008/01/24/in-the-name-of-the-king-another-uwe-boll-fiasco/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2008/01/24/in-the-name-of-the-king-another-uwe-boll-fiasco/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I can see the production planning now.  That kick *ss guy from the Transporter--CHECK.  Relatively attractive blond chick--CHECK.  Burt Reynolds--CHECK.  Let&#039;s greenlight the F*cker!

This movie was bordering on absolutely terrible.  However the WORST of it was not a Burt Reynolds one facelift short of having a chin on his forehead.  It also wasn&#039;t casting virtually talentless Matthew Lillard as Duke Fallow (although I liked him in Hackers).

The most gut-wrenching, bile-inducing decision made by the casting director was to place bad boy Ray Liotta as an evil wizard.  Ray looked like a reject from an 80&#039;s tv sitcom, with black feathered hair and his mafioso delivery.

Uwe Boll should have to pay a fine for directing this stinker. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the production planning now.  That kick *ss guy from the Transporter&#8211;CHECK.  Relatively attractive blond chick&#8211;CHECK.  Burt Reynolds&#8211;CHECK.  Let&#8217;s greenlight the F*cker!</p>
<p>This movie was bordering on absolutely terrible.  However the WORST of it was not a Burt Reynolds one facelift short of having a chin on his forehead.  It also wasn&#8217;t casting virtually talentless Matthew Lillard as Duke Fallow (although I liked him in Hackers).</p>
<p>The most gut-wrenching, bile-inducing decision made by the casting director was to place bad boy Ray Liotta as an evil wizard.  Ray looked like a reject from an 80&#8217;s tv sitcom, with black feathered hair and his mafioso delivery.</p>
<p>Uwe Boll should have to pay a fine for directing this stinker. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Awake&#8230;More Like Asleep by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2007/12/08/awakemore-like-asleep/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 07:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemaddicts.org/blog/2007/12/08/awakemore-like-asleep/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I would tend to disagree.  As you can plainly see in the above photo there is nothing whatsoever attractive about Jessica Alba.

Spank--spank--spank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to disagree.  As you can plainly see in the above photo there is nothing whatsoever attractive about Jessica Alba.</p>
<p>Spank&#8211;spank&#8211;spank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.273 seconds -->
